-
Too small to be “real hernia” …. ultrasound vs MRI?
Thank you for the opportunity to ask questions directly to expert doctors.
I have consistent pain in the testicle, scrotum, and following up above the groin crease towards the hip bone. It’s kind of similar to the feeling of getting lightly hit in the testicles but hard to describe otherwise, it’s deep, not on the skin. I’m a regular guy, office job, reasonably in-shape weekend warrior type. After a bit of web research I thought maybe the pain is a hernia and get the referral.
Ultrasound tech sees 4 millimeters of hernia fat after really digging deep directly into the painful zone of the crease area.
Surgeon dismisses ultrasound, says it probably picked up some abdominal fat and that 4 millimeters is “too small” to be a hernia. Described the ultrasound as “like a rorschach ink blot test where you will see anything you want to see with the ultrasound.” Recommends MRI instead.
MRI of hips and pelvis. No findings.
Next recommendation was colonoscopy, but have not done that yet because it feels like the wrong direction.
I have taken 6 months of rest off of any physical activity to try and “heal” the problem but the pain remains. It doesn’t seem like it’s healing itself which makes me think it is not a muscle problem. There isn’t anything popping out and I have passed multiple multiple cough tests.
Is something “too small” to be a “real hernia” or painful? Is the ultrasound inaccurate? Is MRI conclusive? Have you seen something like this? What next?
Log in to reply.