Dr. Ondiveeran, shown in your link, would be worth seeking out. He seems very open-minded, rational and independent-thinking. Most surgeons just do what they are instructed to do by their clinic or hospital supervisors. And mesh is the mainstream repair method today, it is faster and more cost-effective for the institutions.
Dr. Jacob is quoted also and illustrates the mind-set that people who avoid mesh are just getting advice from the inernet. Then gives the “tough luck, it is what it is” view, “they need to be willing to accept that”. Kind of protective of the status quo.
It’s from 2017, back when their was a big push to understand the problems. Unfortunately, little progress was made and things have stayed the same.
https://www.generalsurgerynews.com/In-the-News/Article/05-17/Your-Patient-Wants-A-MeshFree-Repair/41339?ses=ogst
Dr. Jacob – ““In New York, some patients come to me having done their own online research and they have decided that they don’t want mesh,” said Brian Jacob, MD, assistant clinical professor of surgery at Mount Sinai Hospital, in New York City, and the owner of nychernia.com. …
Patients need to understand that research has shown that hernia repairs without mesh can have higher recurrence rates and still have some reports of chronic pain, and so they need to be willing to accept that,” Dr. Jacob pointed out. “
…
Dr. Ondiveeran – “Polypropylene reinforcement has been the gold standard since Irving L. Lichtenstein, MD, promoted it in the 1980s. “We are really doing very well with it. Recurrence rates are low, about 2%. But recurrence isn’t the only concern,” said Hari Kumar Ondiveeran, MD, at the 2016 annual meeting of the International Hernia Collaboration.
“What about pain? What about the feeling of discomfort young patients complain about having a foreign material in the groin? What about immune response? Is polypropylene as inert as we think it is? And what about cost?””