I think that the post is interesting but not really useful. We need the name of the surgeon at least. I did my homework and got a bad result. Well-respected surgeon, chair of the surgery department, expert in laparoscopy, numerous surgeries performed, used Bard Soft Mesh in a TEP repair. The results should have been excellent.
Even with the name of the surgeon, the one thing that often gets overlooked is probability. The odds. The odds are one in six, at least, apparently, across the spectrum of mesh repair methods, that a person will have mesh problems. So the homework doesn’t help if we don’t know the details and the results, the history, of the surgeon’s other patients.
It’s still a gamble, with bad odds. The people who get good results can’t change the odds. Only collecting accurate long-term results across a surgeon’s patients can identify how to improve the odds for the individual patient.
The good stories are really just stories of an individual’s luck. No offense intended, but really that’s all there is here. You’re one of the lucky ones.