-
Preservation of tissue integrity and function needs to become a priority
Since Dr. Brown butchered me and quite frankly rendered me disabled (I’m 9 months post-op and haven’t missed a day of PT and I’m in permanent dysfunction/discomfort), I’ve been doing serious research and reading.
There seems to be a an absolutely ridiculous disregard for tissue integrity and function in all of these surgeries – especially sports hernias surgery (Dr. Brown’s in my case).
I don’t know why, but every single doctor is only focused on ”making the pain go away” which is why you see so many of them just straight up do triple neurectomies without even trying to figure out if it’s necessary. When a patient comes to you, in pain, they’re looking for help to HEAL BACK to original – including muscle function. It means that PT wasn’t quite enough to take them over the finish line and they need the push from the surgical side to help heal the injury and get them to go back to their original function.
It needs to be a priority as a Doctor to make sure these injuries are approached with a ”less is more” approach. If I would’ve been told how extensively Dr. Brown would butcher my groins, I would’ve waited these 9 months and did more PT. I had pain yes, but I was functional. I was working as a pro dancer. I could go on a hike with friends. I could work on my abs. Most importantly I had HOPE because once in a while everything would click back to normal and the pain would dissipate and so I knew it was still possible. I didn’t have a traditional hernia or a bulge. I just needed a little help. I literally only went in for surgery because we hit a downtime period in my industry and I thought now would be a great time to finally take care of my nagging ache in my groin before going back to business.
Now I still have the pain (so he didn’t correctly identify my injury) but I am seriously, seriously impaired. I can’t properly fire up my core at all across the board and I have way more pain than I had before him. How could it possibly function with the amount of cutting and reconfiguration he did in there?
Your muscles and tissues don’t work individually. They work in harmony with one another, in their original state and configuration. If you alter a muscle’s pathway or configuration – it impact the integrity and strength of every other muscle around it. Now think what happens when someone reconfigures and cuts into SEVERAL layers of muscles, bilaterally and then doesn’t close them back in their original configuration.
As a Doctor treating muscle injuries, if you only know how to ”make pain go away” but not how to preserve and restore muscular function then you shouldn’t be doing what you’re doing. What patient in their right mind would want to trade pain for different pain + dysfunction. Not a single person.
The goal should be to try and identify what hurts because of injury that needs help to heal (surgically) and what hurts because of compensation/nearby injured tissues. Not everything that hurts needs to get cut into. When someone gets injured, nearby tissue overworks in order to stabilize the area. A lot of things will hurt. That doesn’t mean cut into all of them extensively.
There needs to start being some respect for the human body and patients as human beings and not science experiments you can discard once you’re done.
In my case, I wasn’t told my external oblique wouldn’t be closed back together once opened and instead half of it was sewn onto my transverse and half of it was sown on top of the first half. I also wasn’t told he would cut into my inguinal ligament and ”free it” – we did not agree on this. I wasn’t told he would cut into and reconstruct my left inguinal floor and canal despite having no weakness or hernia on that side – only had a 1 inch tear in my external oblique aponeurosis. I would never have agreed to any of those things – it makes no sense at the muscular level. Ironically enough – I picked Dr. Brown because of his stance on foreign objects in the body and I trusted him to only do the strict minimum. Big mistake on my part which cost me my career and my life.
I browse this website, facebook groups and others and I see people with very specific symptoms, who can generally tell you in what order their symptoms appeared, but confronted with Doctors who don’t want to listen to their patients and take the time to figure out causality and what’s necessary and what isn’t. They just want to slap a mesh in, take nerves out, and cut into a bunch of stuff that doesn’t need to be cut into – why?
You get paid either way – so why the blatant disregard for the patients long-term well-being and health? Why did you even become a doctor? I know some doctors lose sight of why they picked the profession and some flat-out just do it for the money especially because this is a niche market. But I would hope that at the root of it all – some of you want to genuinely help people.
And if you do – then it’s your duty to preserve tissue and muscle configuration in it’s original state as much as possible – and disclose to the patient very obviously if you’re going to severely damage or alter their tissues. I asked – repeatedly, if I would still have normal core function and if we could just do the strict minimum to help the injury heal.
Maybe I’m just rambling because I cannot get over how violated I feel. But I think this is a discussion that needs to happen.
If you’re a doctor – please ask yourself if what you’re about to do to someone you would do to your own child in that same situation. If the answer is no – then don’t do it.
And please for the love of god – stop advertising ”95% recovery rates”.
Recovery means the person is back to 95-100% pre-surgery/pre-injury level of both pain and function. If the person now has new dysfunction as a side-effect of your procedure or the same or worse pain – then that person didn’t recover. If you don’t have a single athlete that had your procedure and went back to FULLY competitive levels without any issues – then your treatment does not work you should stop doing it. I feel like these numbers are grossly inflated and do not represent what actually happens.
Log in to reply.