Shouldice vs Kang surgery experience
05/12/2021 at 11:39 pm #29129
I am new to this forum, but I am guessing there are some people who visit here to figure out which is the best surgery for an inguinal hernia, so I decided to join and make this thread.
I have had two inguinal hernias (one on each side), and am probably one of the only people in the world to have had both Shouldice repair in Canada and the relatively new Kang repair in South Korea. So with that, I would like to give my experience with the two.
At Shouldice, I was 13 years old, and I stayed overnight for 2 nights, probably due to my age. The operation took about 45 minutes. With the Kang repair, I was 33 years old and was able to go home 1 hour after the operation. The operation took about 20 minutes. The incision for my Shouldice repair is about 10 cm long, whereas the Kang repair incision is about 3-4 cm.
After both surgeries, I have so far been able to live a normal, active life like nothing has ever happened. The Kang repair seems to have an advantage over the Shouldice repair in my opinion, based on the more appealing incision size which is hardly noticeable, in contrast to the huge Shouldice scar.
I should mention I had the Kang repair done on a Saturday and I went back to work Wednesday without any issues (besides walking slowly and moving carefully, of course). I did not take any pain medication after the first day, despite being given about a week’s supply, as the pain was bearable. I feel like I could have went back to work even on the Monday, but taking some time to rest seemed easier.
Overall, both surgeries were successful. The Kang surgery has the clear advantage over Shouldice, however, due to the much smaller incision.
If you are not sure which operation to get for your hernia, I’d recommend the Kang surgery in Korea, and would steer clear of mesh surgeries due to the potential complications that can arise.
Thanks, and feel free to ask any questions!
05/13/2021 at 5:36 am #29130
At the outset let me state clearly that I long have been a fan of the Kang method but actually of both methods. However for the sake of discussion I must point out, Colin, your comparison being made is applies and oranges. First “A” was done 20 years before “B.” Second, they very likely were very different surgical situations. It’s unfair to both methods. As great as the Kang method may be, it is not proper to put such a supremely classical method as Shouldice in a compromised position as you did. It suggests bias. We can say, however, that from what is presently known about the most recent iterations of both methods, the Kang method appears to have two advantages, incision size and suturing (though some will debate the latter). Another point is how the cremaster muscle is dealt with, seemingly a Kang advantage. As far as your recovery time, etc., here again, is a situational matter. Anyway the three points I mentioned are likely important Kang advantages, but nothing is perfect. Any such comparisons need to be done fairly.
05/13/2021 at 5:24 pm #29139
Thanks for the reply. I am not sure how I was not fair in my comparison. I can only compare the two based on my experience as a patient with both surgeries, and made sure to add my age for clarification. I think I was was completely fair there. I did mention that both were successful, and I was satisfied with both surgeries.
If I lived in Canada, I would likely opt for going to Shouldice due to proximity, saving on travel costs.
However, if I lived anywhere else, I would opt to get the Kang surgery due to the advantages. I couldn’t think of any advantage that Shouldice had over Kang, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a good surgery. Like I said, I’m living a normal life after both surgeries and able to do everything like I’ve never had a hernia in the first place 🙂
05/13/2021 at 6:45 pm #29140
Your points are well taken. Let me clarify my post by noting your original post began by saying “people who visit here to figure out which is the best surgery for an inguinal hernia.” If we’re trying to do that then wouldn’t we want to be systematic doing it?
Because modern medicine is so technological, taking two cases separated by twenty years surely is lopsided. The earlier one is disadvantaged by its older tech or possibly less developed technique. That has to be an unfair comparison.
If I am not mistaken your purpose was to compare the two IH methods you experienced and concluded by saying that one was better. Perhaps that’s true but technically it’s a weak comparison to say the least. I don’t think you would personally decide on a surgery for tomorrow based on that kind of comparison, right? Your post based its conclusion on a Shouldice incision measurement more than 20 yrs. ago or more. The length of incision possibly has shortened over time. Moreover decision of surgery surely wouldn’t be based solely on incision, right?
I appreciate the uniqueness of your experience and welcome your sharing. It would be more appreciative, I believe, if it were less evaluative because of the reasons stated. Friendly chat is appreciated but technical talk prized. Some people will make possibly life-altering decisions based on the information at HT. It’s in our collective interest to together develop information most helpful in that regard. Thank you for your kind attention.
05/13/2021 at 9:12 pm #29141
Thanks for the feedback again.
In this case, would it be better to give a detailed walkthrough of my experiences with both hospitals and surgeries (or my most recent one, since Shouldice may be different these days) instead of evaluating the advantages/disadvantages? If you think that would be beneficial to readers, please let me know!
05/13/2021 at 10:26 pm #29142
Colin, everything flows from purpose. I’m unsure what you want to do. This thread was couched kind of like a strawman debate, which I think you realize that now. What is it that you want to say? When you’ve got that run with it. There are already existing threads that talk about these individual IH methods. Maybe that’s the way: Fit your experience with what was being discussed. I think you would fit right away. 🙂
05/14/2021 at 6:35 am #29143
I just thought after experiencing two leading hernia surgeries, I could compare the two.
A few doctors recommended me to do a mesh surgery before my second hernia operation, saying non-mesh is only for children (which I knew was wrong since Shouldice had many adults, but I couldn’t afford to travel back to Canada from Korea).
Luckily, I found out about the Kang surgery and had a great experience with that. Because of that, I thought I could compare the two since they seem to be two great non-mesh repair methods and they were both very successful. I also want people to be aware of their options and not almost get tricked like I did into getting a mesh 🙂
I will search the forums and see where I can contribute. I probably should have done that before starting a new topic. I appreciate your kindness and understanding as I’m a new user here.
05/14/2021 at 6:44 am #29144AlephyParticipant
Personally I found your post very interesting, you described your personal experience with the two surgeries, which is what people have been doing here since the very beginning. No one is saying that they are showing scientific results out of one’s experience, for that there are medical articles (which are not submitted to this forum for review as far as I know:)
05/14/2021 at 8:01 am #29146
Thanks for your response. I was a patient who had no medical expertise, and I’d assume most patients don’t. I wouldn’t expect patients to know about the tissues involved such as the cremaster muscle previously mentioned, and I don’t think they would care much about that either.
I think what prospective patients care most about is if the surgery will be successful, and if they can live a normal life without complications afterwards. Younger patients may care about the surgical site’s appearance as well, as they could be self-conscious about that, as I was when I was a teen.
I hope my post can help inform some people needing hernia surgery by sharing my story. I think it is especially useful for people living outside of Canada. Had I not searched extensively for Shouldice alternatives, I would not have found out about the Gibbeum hospital in Korea. I was very close to spending thousands more to travel to Canada and get another Shouldice surgery or to take the risk of getting a mesh surgery.
05/14/2021 at 8:19 am #29147mitchtom6Participant
Thanks for your stories. You truly are part of a very, very small population of folks who has experienced these two different non-mesh varieties.
How would you describe your lifestyle? Do you do a lot of physical activity? I’m glad both procedures have been successful for you.
Americans are not used to looking internationally for medical care.
05/14/2021 at 8:20 am #29148
Almost every post is from personal experience. Personal experience is vital.
Colin, you wrote, >I just thought after experiencing two leading hernia surgeries, I could compare the two.<
Of course you can, Colin. But you also were making a claim that X is better than Y, which surely invites discussion. Please recognize that. As I said, your experience can fit in immediately (and variously).
05/14/2021 at 8:25 am #29149
Colin, did Shouldice use steel suturing? If so were you made aware of it at the time? And if so again, do you ever feel a tinge or something?
05/14/2021 at 9:07 am #29150Good intentionsParticipant
Thanks for posting Colin. Parents with children would get great value out of your experience with the Shouldice repair. 20 years, and passage through puberty to adulthood, with no problems, is a success and what any parent would want for their child. Even many of the mesh proponents in the community of surgeons recommend against mesh for adolescents, but there are probably thousands of kids who get it anyway.
And the experience at Gibbeum Hospital is one more verification of a non-mesh option. I have the same question as mitchtom6 about your lifestyle and activities, and also how long it’s been since the Kang repair. Are you a runner or biker, do you play sports, physical labor, etc.?
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by Good intentions.
05/14/2021 at 9:27 am #29153
I’d describe my lifestyle as quite active. I play sports occasionally, and I used to do heavy weightlifting 3 times a week prior to COVID.
After the Shouldice surgery, I was always worried about lifting heavy due to a fear of causing damage to the surgical site (kind of psychological I guess). However, after some time, I got the courage to start lifting heavy again (eg. 100+ kg bench, squat, deadlift), and I haven’t had any issue.
Due to COVID lockdowns, I haven’t weightlifted yet after the Kang surgery, but if I ever do, I will report back how it goes. I’d assume it should be fine as well.
This is the first I’m hearing about steel suturing. My mother also says she can’t recall. But this is a great question because I do indeed occasionally feel an awkward feeling from the Shouldice location every now and then. A “tinge” is a good description of it. It feels almost like something is poking me, like a splinter kind of feeling.
I had no clue what that feeling is and why it comes every few months and lasts for a couple minutes (sometimes longer). I used to think I had an ingrown hair or something I could just never seem to find, but that didn’t really make sense. But the sensation feels a bit close to the surface of the skin like that. Now that you’ve mentioned steel suturing and a tinge feeling, I guess that might answer that question! You may have just inadvertently solved a 20 year old problem of mine. Thanks!
It has been 2 months since my Kang repair. I have been playing basketball a bit lately and I have been riding a bike on weekends for the past 3 weeks so far. Currently, I have no issue with the Kang surgery. I know it has been a short time, but I will continue to update if anything arises. Eventually I will get back to weightlifting and see how that goes as well. However, I do some light exercise at home for the time being.
With the Kang surgery, up until about a month after surgery there has been some burning sensations near the site that were a mild nuisance. These usually happened if I stood or sat in the same position for too long. Dr. Kang also warned me about these uncomfortable feelings that may occur for the first few weeks. However, this no longer occurs and I feel completely normal now. I ride bikes at the same intensity now that I used to without any problem. Running, jumping, etc. during basketball hasn’t been an issue either.
07/08/2021 at 3:10 pm #29531SpartanParticipant
Did you have to stay 2 weeks in a hotel in S.Korea before getting the surgery? If not, when was that Covid 19 lifted in S. Korea?
07/09/2021 at 3:39 am #29539
I currently live in Korea, so I did not. But, at the moment, any visitors must quarantine for 2 weeeks, so you would have to before getting the surgery, I’d assume.
10/16/2021 at 8:02 am #29905
I don’t know if anyone who contributed to this thread is still posting but if they are…
Does shouldice Canada still use metal thread? If so what type of metal?
Is Kang method metal and plastic and foreign material free?
Do either or both cut cut nerves?
Finally thanks Colin for the initial post, most useful getting view of someone who’s had both types of repair.
I do take the point made there’s 20 years between them.
10/17/2021 at 12:25 am #29909
I hope someone can answer these questions because I’m curious as to the materials as well now.
As for the nerves, I haven’t permanently lost any feeling from either surgery. After the Kang surgery (since I can attest to that, being so recent), I only had temporary numbness at the site and in part of the scrotum for about 3 months post surgery, after which all feeling came back. I was told in advance that this is what would happen as well.
Upon searching, it appears one nerve is cut during Shouldice surgery (probably in both surgeries I’d assume, but I can’t find that info for Kang). I don’t remember how it felt exactly after Shouldice surgery, but I can at least tell you I have all feeling in that area right now as well.
10/17/2021 at 1:14 am #29910
Was it Dr Kang who did the surgery himself? Do members of his team carry put the surgery too on occasions meaning you can’t always guarantee having Dr Kang himself?
10/17/2021 at 6:15 pm #29917
I am quite certain only Dr. Kang and his son are able to conduct the surgeries. My surgery was done by the younger Dr. Kang, who happened to speak English really well btw which was convenient.
10/17/2021 at 11:29 pm #29920JohnsoParticipant
Dr. Towfigh did a Hernia Talk Live Session with Dr. Spencer Netto from the Shouldice Clinic last year. Here is the link:
If you are interested it is worth a listen to hear what they do with the cremasteric muscle, the nerves and why they still use stainless steel sutures.
On the internet I have found 2 different stories as to why Dr. Shouldice started using stainless steel sutures but the most common and probably the actual reason is its minimal inflammatory properties.
I wonder if a highly sensitive metal detector would be able to detect stainless steel sutures and therefore satisfy your curiosity.
10/17/2021 at 11:33 pm #29921
Thanks Johnso… I dont suppose anyone knows if the stainless steel shouldice use has nickel in it?
As I’ve said elsewhere I do get skin irritation from some metal watch backs, some belt buckles and some coat zips if they go up to neck.
10/17/2021 at 11:50 pm #29922JohnsoParticipant
Here is a link I found wrt stainless steel sutures. Nickel is listed and I believe it is generally used in the manufacturing of stainless steel. I don’t know what percentage of nickel is in the sutures used at Shouldice.
I believe most surgeons doing Shouldice repairs outside of the Shouldice Clinic use a synthetic suture such as prolene but I am not an expert.
- This reply was modified 7 months ago by Johnso.
10/18/2021 at 1:46 am #29925
Thanks Johnso I’ve read that medical stainless steel uses about 8% nickel
I dont know I have a nickel allergy for sure but surface skin reaction to metal items suggests some metal items cause rash, itching and small sore areas on me
I can’t believe no allergy testing is undertaken. Seems a bit lax.
Also seems every way I turn there’s a problem.
If I react badly to steel/nickel it seems to rule out shouldice Canada as once the sutures are in, I’m assuming it’s unsafe to take out?
Now I’m looking for non mesh with no nerve cutting and no metallic sutures… Any suggestions or recommendations anyone?
10/18/2021 at 10:20 am #29929MarkTParticipant
Just last night, I watched the HerniaTalk Live with Dr. Samer Sbayi (Stoneybrook in NY) as guest. He trained for 1yr at Shouldice and offers that repair.
Shouldice does use stainless steel (316L), but seems to ‘fallback on Prolene’)? Dr. Sbayi uses the exact same stainless steel, but he also uses Prolene.
Start at the 10:00 mark…at 16:55, they discuss environmental allergies, including nickel and manganese. Dr. Sabyi also mentions having removed stainless steel in a patient who had a reaction and replacing with Prolene.
- This reply was modified 7 months ago by MarkT.
10/18/2021 at 1:47 am #29926
Maybe its an impossible dream?
10/18/2021 at 10:46 am #29932
Google suggests prolene is probably less likely to cause a reaction.
10/18/2021 at 10:50 pm #29937
Actually Pinto, for me, if Colin’s experiences of two different surgeries were hidden in other posts, not sure it would be as easy to see. I’m finding it difficult searching back to things I’ve read in posts that I’d like to remember… for instance:-
I read things to ask UK non mesh surgeon, think it was about cutting cremaster nerve in a thread – not able to find it again.
Also in another were the supplements that had be taken prior to operation.
There can’t be many people who have had 2 different non mesh operations so it was good to hear from someone who has. I dint think there was any intentional bias anymore than there would be if I said “gas” at dentist when I was 8 but injection in my 30s, I found injection better for me.
10/19/2021 at 4:07 pm #29939danParticipant
From what i know, Dr Kang uses pds suture which are slow absorbable (130-180 days to fully absorb)
I am a korean american looking to get dr kang’s surgery once the pandemic ends. I will probably update once i get one. However, there is a story written by a korean woman on her blog about her experience with the surgery. She became pregnant 1 year after surgery and gave birth through c-section. According to her, her hernia did not reoccur even after holding a baby inside her.
Do what you will with that info
10/20/2021 at 4:29 am #29949
Dan, I’m not sure the pandemic will be short lived. UK rates are on the rise for example. I’d be interested in a Dr Kang repair too but I am not keen on flying! And at the moment I think it would be 14 day quarantine although not sure if that applies if you are double jabbed and or had third/booster.
Do you know the quarantine procedure requirements by any chance?
The pregnant woman anecdote. Thanks for that. It does go along with the Gipum hospital low reoccurrence figures. And I’d imagine having a baby inside, with the turning and pushing, etc would put a lot of pressure on her body.
10/21/2021 at 11:07 am #29969danParticipant
Yeah the quarantine requirement is 14 days unless you apply for a quarantine exemption. If you want to go get dr kang’s surgery, it’s likely you would have to wait until the lockdown is over.
10/21/2021 at 7:53 pm #29979
Even if you’ve had your 2 shots, you still need to quarantine for 14 days. However, you can apply for an exemption from your Korean embassy/consulate, and maybe in the case of surgery they’ll exempt you.
Otherwise, starting in November, the government will be easing restrictions and gradually start treating covid similarly to the flu.
10/19/2021 at 8:18 pm #29944
@William Bryant, in apparent reference to my point about Colin’s comparison, you wrongly imply I stated his bias was intentional. I never said nor implied it. Actually your recent remark about prolene proves my point. I agree his experiences are quite interesting and useful–indeed–but as I tried to point out technology over 30 years surely has advanced Shouldice in some way. (Your example of dental gas/injection is inapplicable because those techniques do not separate methodology; whereas this thread as titled has methodologies in contrast.) Thus Shouldice of 2021 should be the focal point not that of 1970 (approx.). As long as medical methods are fairly compared then all will be well I’m sure. Thank you.
10/20/2021 at 4:10 am #29945
Sorry Pinto I didn’t mean to imply you meant Colin’s “bias” was intentional.
Whether the shouldice technique has changed at all is an unknown, apparently. It may have changed, it may not have done. It cant just be assumed it has. And even if it has changed it may not have been for the better!
So unless we can find someone who has had both Kang and Shouldice operations with only a short time between them, Colin’s experience is pretty unique and I appreciate his time posting it.
Albeit I fully take on board your point about the time difference between the two. But then what should be the ideal time difference for comparisons? 1 minute, 1 month, 1 year, 1 decade? Simultaneously?
And then is it fair to compare if one is carried out by the inventor and the other by someone other than the person responsible for it’s existence.
Basically Colin’s comparison is about the best we have got and are likely to get.
But I always enjoy reading your posts so thanks for your comments too.
10/20/2021 at 4:21 am #29948
And even better that Colin still posted all this time later when asked questions.
10/20/2021 at 6:57 am #29950
@William Bryant, gracious of you to say sorry. Thank you. My message was as much for Colin as for you because originally, way back when, I don’t think he understood my point about comparison making and may have taken it personally. So I didn’t want the “intentional” matter to reinforce that. Let me clarify please.
You suggested prolene might be an advancement on steel suture demonstrating that over time technology can improve medical practice. The Shouldice treatment Colin received in 1970 (approx.) is likely not the same as that done today.(Shouldice is also not a unified method: variants exist.) It has likely improved in some way. Because Colin expressed some disfavor comparatively with Shouldice, his comparison is therefore biased. The comparison was not equivalently made because the other surgery method was from 2021! It’s apples and oranges.
Furthermore, I never stated nor implied that comparison should not be made. As Colin later stated, he did not know his Shouldice treatment likely used steel suturing, which he now attributes the steel to his periodic tinges felt. Those tinges may have influenced his apparent disfavor with the Shouldice. In short, the basis of this present thread is faulty–it sets Shouldice up as a “strawman” in comparison to another surgery method (even if not intended!). It is irrefutable: an already disfavored older version of Shouldice is compared with a different surgery method of today.
Yes, compare the two methods or any others you want, but do so fairly. And yes, too, look at Colin’s experiences with both methods. That’s fine but again do so fairly. I think Colin’s purpose was simply to say, “Hey, I had both operations. Ask me whatever you like about it.” Of course very interesting and useful but what also came out–whether intended or not–was some misdirection by pitting the two approaches against each other unfairly.
Here’s something that probably many of you overlooked: Colin’s Shouldice passed the test of time: No recurrence. How about the other method? We don’t know yet: Colin’s operation was just months ago. Also, Shouldice has a lot of verifiable research studies in support. The other method does not.
10/20/2021 at 7:07 am #29951
Brilliant Pinto, that answer was very thought provoking. Got me thinking anyway!
10/20/2021 at 9:03 am #29955
Just to clarify, I wasn’t yet alive in 1970. My Shouldice surgery was in 1999 – still quite some time ago, but almost 30 years ahead of the time being mentioned here.
I believe I have mentioned as well that I have had no major issues after my Shouldice surgery, and it definitely was a great success. I also haven’t thus far had any issues with the Kang surgery since fully recovering, and I have been back to my regular life. But like pinto mentioned, it’s only been a few months.
Out of curiosity, I wonder what the differences between a 1999 and 2021 Shouldice operation would be. Does anyone know where I can find information about what improvements have been made?
10/20/2021 at 9:13 am #29956
Sorry, my math was wrong when I calculated the date (I was calculating using my Korean age which puts me 2 years older). I turned 13 in Dec. 2000. So the surgery was in 2001. Not a significant difference though.
10/20/2021 at 9:25 am #29957
Hello Colin thanks for coming back on and clarifying, I really appreciate your post/s.
I’m not sure if there have been any advancements, I’ve just read an article from a Canadian, hernia and general, surgeon, feels the shouldice Canada results are skewed a bit because in the surgeons view, shouldice is selective about who it performs the surgery on. In their the “healthy”, apart from hernia. The surgeon was also critical that shouldice Canada doesn’t follow up, patients, more long term than it does. So disappointed clients years later won’t show as anything but successes as they were pleased to start with.
I don’t know if that’s all true.
At least in your case shouldice Canada has been a success. And it looks like the kang one too.
The Korean age? How does that work? Is there any around the world that would make me younger?
10/20/2021 at 9:33 am #29958
Here is the link for the article above in case anyone is interested. Being, relatively, new to this forum if my posting contravenes any forum rules. Please just delete it. Thank you.
10/20/2021 at 12:19 pm #29960Good intentionsParticipant
Don’t overlook that people create sites on the internet for many reasons. That surgeon created her site just to voice her opinions about various things she sees at her work, and other causes she is concerned about. As she says, she writes for pleasure. But, really, she’s just another surgeon who does hernia repair.
She is a political candidate. She has Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram accounts. She wants her voice to be heard. In today’s world, taking an opposing view, to almost anything, is enough to get your name out there. But, besides being a surgeon, there is no sign that she is an expert in hernia repair methods. No publications or presentations about hernia repair methods. Just another person with an opinion. She seems to be involved in good causes but that might not transfer to surgery results.
The scientific papers and especially the studies that look at long-term results are where people should get the data that they use to form their own opinions. The numbers show the reality of what’s happening. The typical surgeon will stay in contact with their hernia repair patient for three to six weeks, then never hear from them again. Anecdotes from surgeons are not really very useful.
Just something to consider. You can find internet information to support any opinion these days. Understand your information sources. Good luck.
10/20/2021 at 10:47 am #29959
Hey, no need to thank me for anything, I’m just happy there’s a discussion going and people can get some information as a result.
I quickly read through that link, and I don’t know… She recommends mesh surgery… I’m not a medical professional, but I strongly oppose mesh repairs based on anecdotes I’ve read from patients, as well as based on my own experience. With recurrence rates being so low for Shouldice, Kang, etc. there’s no reason to opt for a mesh.
I see she brought up the point of the length of stay at Shouldice, and I think that varies a lot from patient to patient. I know I stayed at least 2 nights at Shouldice, and my “roommate” I guess you’d call him, who was a firefighter, also stayed at least that long. So if that’s the norm at Shouldice still, I’d definitely say Kang has an advantage in that regard since patients are able to go home 1 hour after surgery (as was my case), or stay the night if they wish.
As for the Korean age, when you’re born in Korea, they consider that to be 1 year old, and you age every New Year. So since I was born Dec. 1987, the next month, I’d be 2 years old. Therefore, my Korean age is almost always 2 years above my actual age, and I use that age over here, which is why I got the surgery year wrong by 2. I’m not sure there is any country that reduces your age unfortunately!
10/20/2021 at 12:53 pm #29961
I agree Good Intentions, it’s so difficult to know what is best. For my part Im thinking non mesh is better for me but then one day it’s shouldice the next Kang. It gets very confusing. And already feeling apprehensive about surgery just clouds the issue further.
I didnt pay too much attention to that blogger as she did seem keen to push mesh, so no surprise she didn’t write supprtive of non mesh.
10/20/2021 at 6:13 pm #29962MarkTParticipant
I have read that surgeon’s long blog post before and have problems with a lot of it. I may write a more detailed reply later, but I’ll say two things for now:
1. She ignores that the surgical community has not ‘moved on’ because the Shouldice method has been judged an inferior repair…in fact, it seems to have moved on primarily due to outside influences and pressures to public healthcare systems.
2. She is largely not approaching this from a patient perspective. The bulk of her criticisms are irrelevant for many individual patients, especially to those who meets Shouldice’s patient criteria.
10/21/2021 at 7:53 am #29965
She’s disgraceful. Her peers ought to sanction her. She has sour grapes because she works as a general surgeon who likely earns less than her specialist counterpart and maybe has a more demanding job. She rationalizes why her job is better however by nearly slandering Shouldice doctors using questionable evidence.
She is an example how we laypeople can overestimate the intelligence of doctors. Note she gives lip service to following fact-based practice, yet contradicts herself by criticizing Shouldice by false or frivolous claims. She lacks the critical awareness or mindfulness that we would expect from a medical professional.
10/21/2021 at 2:45 pm #29973
I’m a bit ashamed of posting the link now but anyway it did strike me at the time that her views on non mesh would be clouded by the fact she does mesh.. a case of well she would say that wouldn’t she, to paraphrase that UK legal case quote from years back.
Getting back to shouldice or Kang… That’s the nub of it for me at present and I can’t quite decide which would be best for me. I’m not good at decisions and this is a big one which makes it harder still.
10/21/2021 at 4:06 pm #29974
On the contrary you can be applauded. Did you read the comments to her piece? In totality, we learn a lot from it. I appreciated the post because I haven’t seen such before for both the wretchedness of the doc and then the info from the outpouring of comments. Don’t rush your decision unless of course your doc tells you. Apparently there are a lot of people who manage well despite hernia. I think you are from the UK. Did you catch the recent post from a UK-er who appeared to find a great doc in Germany? He was gleeful how attractive the option was for someone from UK.
10/22/2021 at 3:27 am #29983
Not sure I have Pinto, thanks for mentioning it. What thread was it on? I am from the UK, you’re right, and by sounds of it, it sounds like the German repair was very successful. Was it Dr Koch? Thanks for thinking of it for me. Anymore info greatly appreciated.
10/22/2021 at 4:12 am #29985
10/22/2021 at 8:20 am #29986
Thanks Pinto. It sounds as though that went well. One thing that does bother me is Dr M has one or two bad reviews and I believe she is within biohernia umbrella.
10/22/2021 at 8:29 am #29987
Thanks Pinto. It sounds as though that went well. One thing that does bother me is Dr M has one or two bad reviews and I believe she is within biohernia umbrella. Anyway I note one of the replies mentions UK patient got in touch with PALS to ask which is UK surgeons may do mesh free – so might try that. Thanks again, more food for thought for me.
10/22/2021 at 6:15 pm #29992Jack2021Participant
And the Desarda repair is a third option to consider as well isn’t it?
I might be wrong, but I think Pinto may have been referring to Scarletville from the UK, who recently posted about his experience in Germany with regard to ‘local anaesthesia and conscious sedation’ – https://herniatalk.com/forums/topic/german-covid-19-restrictions/
Although not mentioned in that post, I believe Scarletville’s operation was possibly carried out by Dr Ralph Lorenz, one of the German doctors I mentioned to you in another post, William. Dr Lorenz is a member of the European Hernia Society Board and he offers both a modified Shouldice repair or a Desarda repair for his tissue based repairs.
Here’s the set of posts where Scarletville talks about booking in with Dr Lorenz. https://herniatalk.com/forums/topic/dr-js-own-hernia/
I’ve messaged @scarletville to ask if it was Dr Lorenz he saw and how his recovery is going, but he hasn’t replied as yet, but hopefully he will soon.
What do others think about the Desarda repair, as there is an option for this in the UK (and I don’t mean with the consultant in London who in the end referred Scarletville to Dr Lorenz)?
I know there are posts here on HerniaTalk that list issues for some and positives for others re a consultant in the US, but all other research and meta studies I’ve seen, appear to be very favourable with results seemingly on a par with the Shouldice repair.
My experience from contacting a number of consultants across the UK and Germany is that they all know each other pretty well. Some mentioned that the hernia specialist community is relatively small, which is perhaps a concern considering the number of repairs carried out worldwide.
10/25/2021 at 4:09 pm #30047ScarletvilleParticipant
Hey, despite booking in with Dr Lorenz due to Covid politics I wasn’t able to travel to Germany for surgery and was left in limbo with no dates as to when it would be possible. Given it was a key time in my life and this was the 2nd tissue repair surgery I painstakingly tracked down and booked in I gave up and got a mesh repair. Had the repair done under a local and made a post about it, recovery is going amazingly. I couldn’t be more happy to so far in not be in the category of horror stories.
10/23/2021 at 2:05 am #29997
Which is the surgeon in the UK that dies the desarda repair Jack? I’d it the Leicester doctor or the younger surgeon in Northumberland (I’ve lost track of names).
Yes Jack, desarda is another option and thanks for reminding me.
So, of the 3 ( Desarda, Shouldice or Kang). Which would be forums members first choice if there were no limiting factors such as time, distance, etc.
10/23/2021 at 10:57 pm #30027
If I consider ONLY the surgery, then for me, I feel practically the same right now after both surgeries, like I’ve never had either operation. The only difference is the incision size, which I mentioned at the beginning of the thread. And as a patient, I only care about how I feel after the surgery, if I can still do everything I did before, and to a lesser degree, what the site looks like. It’s basically a tie between Shouldice and Kang, with a small edge to Kang for the smaller incision.
But if we factor in other things such as recovery, I give Kang a greater edge. The fact I was able to go home after 1 hour and felt good enough to go to work after 2 days was really beneficial and also a surprise to me. I didn’t have that experience at Shouldice, but perhaps someone with a more recent Shouldice experience could elaborate on recovery time there to give you a more fair comparison.
10/23/2021 at 4:12 pm #30021
Jack, thanks for the backup there. I couldn’t find the thread you mentioned. That’s what I had in mind.
10/26/2021 at 2:51 am #30054
Good to hear you are mending well. Hope it continues.
Do know …
Which surgeon did the mesh repair and which type of mesh was it?
Was it NHS or private?
Good Intentions has a “good” mesh successes thread – maybe if you have time post details there as they may be of use to others.
Once again glad it’s working out well for you.
10/26/2021 at 11:52 pm #30066spinotzaParticipant
Hey there @Scarletville. I’m also getting ready to get a mesh repair privately in the UK. I am also curious which clinic you chose/was assigned to. I’m thinking of getting it at the Oxford Hernia Clinic butI can still change my mind! Kang/Desarda/Shouldice would normally be options too but I’m not comfortable getting a surgery abrod in covid times, just in the small chance something bad happens I’d rather be in my home country where I have a support network.
- This reply was modified 6 months, 3 weeks ago by spinotza.
10/27/2021 at 7:19 am #30069ScarletvilleParticipant
I got mine done in a small private hospital in a small place called Scunthorpe https://trentcliffs.co.uk/. The Surgeon has a recurrence rate of about 2%. The logic behind it was basically that I wanted it done under a local, please see my experience post of that if you’re interested and that if you go to a place where the approach is sort of local first rather than general the price is wildly different. I paid 2k for the entire experience, Martin Kurzer with the St John & St Elizabeth Hospital in London was charging like 3.7k for the same thing. I initially spoke to Martin but seriously the guy was so rude to me it’s just obscene anyway besides the point. Simply put under a LA you can get treatment considerably cheaper if that’s their focus, if you go to a place that does generals all the time then you get given that price. I wanted a LA because I didn’t like the idea of a general and the experience was fantastic while also saving me £1.7k. The small hospital offered incredible care and wait times were non-existent. You can quite literally book in for surgery same week, go to the hospital and practically walk straight into the operating room. At all points there were at least 3x the number of staff to patients looking after us.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.