-
Rates, percentages, and trends in lap versus open
I came across a short SAGES presentation, from 2020, about ten year trends in laparoscopic hernia repair. With all of the articles and videos about laparoscopy a person gets the impression that laparoscopy dominates the hernia repair market. But, apparently, lap is only about 40% of the market, open is 60%.
Which begs the question of “where are the open repair problem stories?”. I think that the reason might be a matter of degree and paths to a solution. Open repair problems seem to be less significant to the patient than lap mesh problems so the people that have them don’t end up on forums like this one seeking solutions. There might be other reasons but I can’t think of them. To a normal patient, surgery is surgery. Get the diagnosis, get a referral, go to surgery, hope that you get healed. If lap mesh is 2/3 the volume of open surgery (probably mostly mesh – Lichtenstein or other) why are the stories on this forum mostly about lap mesh? Something doesn’t seem right.
The presenter notes that the CPT codes he used for the study don’t distinguish between TEP, TAPP, or robotic (still not calling robotic TAPP although that’s what it is), but he doesn’t say anything at all about the types of open repair. Another one of those blind spots. All mesh types are “mesh” and all open surgeries are “open” to a lap surgeon, apparently.
Anyway, another one of those things that makes you wonder. Why are there so many lap mesh complaints on this forum when lap mesh is not the predominant method of repair? The ratios don’t follow the overall volume of methods used.
“Ten Year Trends in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A NSQIP Database Review”
Log in to reply.