Forum Replies Created

Page 80 of 116
  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 26, 2019 at 2:28 am in reply to: Patulous bilateral inguinal canals containing fat
    quote Forest:

    I did see a hernia specialist yesterday. He does robotic, laporascopic surgery–seemed to believe my situation will be relatively easy–all three are small. I am feeling more confident after seeing him.

    I can not emphasize enough, here or in my past posts, about how everybody is fooled by the comforting words. First from the device makers to the surgeons, then from the surgeons to the patients.

    Your surgeon is going to implant one or two large pieces of mesh in to your abdomen. Probably two, they always find a defect on the other side, The pain you feel now will be nothing compared to the hopelessness you’ll feel if you have mesh problems. There are many stories on this forum from very healthy athletic people who had mesh problem. You have other problems in addition to mesh problems. No offense, but you are not “healthy” so your issues will probably be even worse. Talk to your urologist about how they will have to deal with the mesh if you need a prostate operation. They will have to cut through it or go around it, and your hernia surgeon is probably going to use the largest piece possible.

    Do not assume that all of the surgeons talk to each other and are working together, discussing your situation, to help you. They don’t and they aren’t. They are all “specialists” in today’s world and only do what they specialize in, with very little consideration for their fellow surgeons or for your future problem.

    I wish I had positive words for you but you are on the path that many people of the forum have been on. You can read through the Topics and find some of their stories from start to today, and the similarities will scare you. Comforting words from the surgeon (easy, I’ve done many, International Guidelines), pulling the trigger to get mesh implantation, regretting it. Be careful.

    Good luck.

  • I am fairly sure that the Shouldice Hospital actually uses stainless steel suture material for the actual Shouldice procedure. It’s been a discussion topic. They might use absorbable suture material for closure of the entry point, but I think that everyone does that.

    These are good questions though, because “pure tissue” is often used to describe what are really sutured tissue repairs. It’s not pure.

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09155.x

    “SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT/MATERIALS

    Stainless steel wire 32–34 G is the suture material of choice, and originally chosen because it is inert and does not form a nidus of infection, should one occur. Initially the wire can be difficult to handle but this problem is soon overcome.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 26, 2019 at 1:59 am in reply to: More decisions to make suturing materials

    I don’t think that many people really consider the type of suture material used. It’s also not clear that it’s the material itself, the polymer, that causes mesh problems, or if it’s the structure of the fabric and how it interacts with the body once it gets filled with collagen.

    It’s a good question but I don’t think that you’ll get a firm answer.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 26, 2019 at 1:56 am in reply to: Mesh Removal

    I assume that your question is more of a rhetorical statement, but some details might let people offer some advice.

    The type of mesh that was removed, the method of removal, were any nerves cut, when is the pain felt, etc.

    There a few counterintuitive things I discovered about healing from mesh removal surgery. Like being more active when pain does not diminish, if the pain is constant while inactive.

    Good luck. Supply some details.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 17, 2019 at 4:48 pm in reply to: Patulous bilateral inguinal canals containing fat

    The pain indicates that the material, “fat” or omentum, has already pushed through, or created, an opening. The “fat” in the canal indicates that “breakthrough” has already occurred.

    The odds of intestine strangulation are low, especially if there is no intestine in the canals now. The odds of chronic pain from mesh are about one in six. Don’t get in a hurry to get this new problem behind you. Use the numbers and data available to make the right decision for the rest of your life. Mesh problems can not be “fixed”, only modified to less painful problems. Even if you schedule a procedure to get on the books continue to do research, and change your mind if you don’t feel right about it. There is very little accountability for problems with hernia repair. You will have very little recourse if you have problems. Get it right the first time.

    Be very careful when listening at your consultations. Don’t get persuaded by confident words if they can’t be verified. Don’t confuse the number of implantations they’ve done with expertise in understanding how to minimize your risk of chronic pain. If your surgeon can only talk about how many operations they’ve performed but not about the long-term success rate of those procedures find a different surgeon. All surgeons should know how their work lasts, over many years. Lack of knowledge does not mean success. Mesh repair is easy and simple for the surgeon but the consequences can be huge and difficult for you. Experience in mesh implantation is not the same as hernia repair expertise.

    Good luck.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 16, 2019 at 4:14 pm in reply to: Recently diagnosed with inguinal Hernia

    This Topic, linked below, might help your thought process. Fascinating how “mesh” has completely taken over the hernia repair field. Almost exclusively due to the Herniasurge “International” Guidelines. The result of that single effort, the meeting and the publication, is treated as gospel. The people behind it got everything that they hoped for. It’s incredible.

    https://www.herniatalk.com/10885-surgeons-with-hernias-what-would-they-do

    https://twitter.com/Herniadoc/status/1114246402950012930

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 15, 2019 at 7:07 am in reply to: Open removal at 2 months vs 2 years..

    The mesh does not grow in to your existing tissue. Your body creates new tissue around the mesh fibers.

    Somewhere around three to four weeks is considered the point at which the mesh has been enveloped enough by body tissue that it can’t easily be pulled free. But the body will continue to try to get back to its original “code” forever. At two months I think that most surgeons would consider your device fully “incorporated”. That is a misnomer, of course, since the mesh never becomes one with the body.

    You’ve been talking to experts, I suggest asking them these questions directly. Do they see better results from early removal than late? Is there a certain length of time after which waiting is pointless? The patient will never get better? If they know the answer then they can help people get on with their lives when they have problems. It’s a difficult question because they, and we, all want to believe that the body will heal itself if given enough time. Often, I think, the reality is that the patient just accepts their new diminished life.

    I was surprised in your other topic that Dr. Jacob was ready to remove your mesh right away. He is very active in the field. That is telling. He must know something, or he is just very confident in his abilities. Or he might have seen some flaws in the method or material used on you.

    Good luck. Keep collecting information. Eventually an answer will come.

  • Can you give more detail on the surgery? “Laparoscopic with mesh” covers many different combinations of material and method. Which side was the original hernia on? Did the surgeon find another and repair it while he/she was there?

    The answer to both of your questions is yes. People have had your problem, and mesh does fold. Read through the many topics on the site, there is a recent one with a similar problem. I think that any direct contact of a nerve with the mesh can cause pain.

    Get your surgery notes and there might be some clues there. The advice that you will receive is to wait and see what happens, because it’s only been three weeks. Good luck.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 13, 2019 at 6:06 pm in reply to: Second I.H.: surgery or not?

    Since you know what at least one type of mesh repair feels like, consider a suture-based repair on the second one. If it fails, via recurrence not chronic pain, then you can always get a mesh repair. The logical path of hernia repair is suture first, then take the risk of chronic pain frommesh if the suture repair fails.

    Today’s methodology gives all patients the highest risk of chronic pain/discomfort from the very beginning. Start over from the less risky point.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 13, 2019 at 3:56 pm in reply to: Parietene Mesh removal vs pain management.

    It looks like you’re taking the right approach, collecting information from the experts. Fascinating though that there are so many different opinions.

    I found that over time I developed a fairly accurate idea of what was happening with my mesh problem. It was a broad-based inflamed feeling, wherever the mesh was, with a specific area that felt wrong. And that’s what was found, a folded area with nerve entrapment in the specific area and edematous tissue, tissue swollen with excess fluid, wherever the mesh was. As you learn more about how the mesh was placed and what was intended and what could have gone wrong you’ll probably understand what the root cause of your problem is.

    I would still follow up on the odd parts of your notes. You might find that they are incorrect, or that they are correct and the wrong mesh was used. Parietene is not indicated for inguinal hernias. That might be a more significant reason to have the mesh removed, if he used the wrong material it might be prone to worse problems in the long-term. “Transparent” polypropylene is not the same as normal semi-crystalline polypropylene, and the anti-adhesion properties might give unknown results. You might be part of an experiment.

    I hope that you find a simple solution but it’s best to be prepared for the worst.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 13, 2019 at 3:02 am in reply to: Parietene Mesh removal vs pain management.

    What was your friend’s original problem? You might be comparing apples to oranges.

    Listen carefully to what the professionals tell you. Your description, “barely touching it produces 10/10 pain”, suggests that you have direct contact with a nerve. I am just a guy on the internet but I see just one factor, not a vague “multi-factorial” problem.

    There is still much that is odd about your story. Odd mesh, odd procedure. Get a second opinion from a respected hernia expert. It’s too soon to be taking advice from friends with non-specific problems.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 13, 2019 at 2:30 am in reply to: Messed up hernia repair after core workout?
    quote Lee_2019:

    Hi, I’m in my mid 40’s and had laparoscopic mesh repair 8 weeks ago for an inguinal hernia.

    Should I be concerned that I’ve compromised my hernia repair?

    Your body will be adapting to the hernia repair mesh for years, actually for the rest of your life. It is a “foreign body”. As the body reacts to it, it and the tissue around it will contract. Then your activities will restretch those tissues, causing damage and more shrinkage. The cycle will continue until you hit a stable point if you are lucky.

    Browse through the topics on the forum and you’ll get a feel for what to expect.

    Good luck.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 8, 2019 at 7:27 pm in reply to: long term efficacy of triple neurectomy
  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 8, 2019 at 7:23 pm in reply to: long term efficacy of triple neurectomy
    quote inguinalpete:

    A bunghole named Dr. Daniel vargo of university of utah did a triple nerve removal on me during a sports hernia operation after saying none would be removed. The only Ill effect has been some skin numbness. The progrip mesh is the problem for me.

    The insults won’t help to find a solution, although the urge is understood. Objective analysis is the way to go, I think.

    Mesh is not typically used for sports hernia repair. I don’t think that neurectomy is either. It looks like you might have had a misdiagnosis from the beginning, and your “sports hernia” was actually an inguinal hernia. Mesh has no place in athletic pubalgia repair according to surgeons who understand the problem.

    [USER=”2580″]DrBrown[/USER] [USER=”935″]drtowfigh[/USER]

    Still not right to perform a prophylactic triple neurectomy. Seems like mal practice.

    Good luck. Start a topic specific to your problem and people might have some advice.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 8, 2019 at 4:19 pm in reply to: Parietene Mesh removal vs pain management.

    Joshio, your method actually looks like a “modified” Lichtenstein method, by the descriptions in the video below. You can find people touting the benefits of mesh but still experimenting. Lichtenstein’s method is perfected but needs more perfecting. The usual comments about tension and avoiding nerves, even though tension is created during the healing process, pulling on the nerves. The use of Parietene is still odd.

    Do some research on the nerves that are described and you’ll probably find the one that affects your pain. The mesh is probably rubbing on the nerve or a suture has pulled free. You have a difficult problem ahead of you. Pain management will treat the symptoms but leave the cause. And there are very recent studies confirming that NSAID’s are even worse for people than has been disclosed in the past. Long-term use of pharmaceuticals is not really a solution.

    Good luck.

    3:00, 5:30, and 8:45 are interesting points.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG_9bv2A-UM

    NSAID’s

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2724772

    http://www.nephjc.com/news/nsaids

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 8, 2019 at 5:44 am in reply to: Parietene Mesh removal vs pain management.

    You have a strange situation Joshio. Parietene is not, apparently, designed for inguinal hernia repair. It’s a composite mesh, designed to reduce adhesions. And your surgery notes say some things that seem unusual, although I am not a surgeon so might be wrong. It seems like he did quite a bit of suturing. Overall, it looks like you’ve had an unusual material used in an unusual way.

    If I read the notes right, you had an indirect hernia. The surgeon basically reformed your internal ring, using mesh, but used a lot more mesh than seems necessary. All the way to the pubic tubercle. Your report reads oddly so getting a second opinion from another hernia expert still seems advisable. Surgeons can do whatever they feel is appropriate. It looks like yours had some unique ideas.

    Although his method might be the latest and greatest, for open with mesh. It’s hard to tell. Good luck.

    [USER=”935″]drtowfigh[/USER]

    [USER=”2580″]DrBrown[/USER]

    https://www.herniatalk.com/12210-abnormal-inguinal-surgery-complications-sharp-flank-pains-and-much-more

    https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-us/products/hernia-repair/parietene-ds-composite-mesh.html

    “Parietene™ DS composite mesh is part of our commitment to offering solutions that can help you advance patient care.

    It’s made from a transparent macroporous polypropylene that’s easy to work with because it’s not too soft or too rigid.1,2

    Plus, on one side, we’ve given it an absorbable synthetic film to help minimize unwanted tissue attachment.3,†

    The result is a balanced mesh that’s been designed with you — and your patients — in mind.

  • It sounds like one of your main nerves is in contact with the mesh or has been damaged, or is bound up in scar tissue and being stressed. It’s not uncommon. A hernia specialist will know. Beware the runaround that often happens when there are problems with a mesh repair. You can spend a lot of time and money while “they” send you from specialist to specialist, hoping that you just learn to live with the new problem. Waiting for you to give up. The referral to a urologist is typical, urologists generally know very little about mesh repairs except that the mesh is in the way for prostate surgery.

    It looks like you might have had your surgery at Dr. Wright’s place of practice. Can you share the details of your surgery notes?

    https://www.uwmedicine.org/locations/general-surgery-harborview

  • Get a copy of your medical records. “Open with mesh” is not enough information. There are many many types of mesh devices that are implanted via open surgery, or anterior approach, as they say.

    The low testicle is probably due to irritation/inflammation/swelling of the spermatic cord and cremaster muscle, although testicular pain is not normal. That could be a sign of a more serious problem.

    Seek a second opinion from a hernia expert. Find one yourself, don’t get stuck in the referral cycle. The staff at many places will just use the internet like you would to choose a referral. There is a surgeon at the University of Washington who seems conscientious, involved, and aware. Dr. Wright, I believe.

    https://www.uwmedicine.org/bios/andrew-wright

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 6, 2019 at 3:26 am in reply to: One year seven months since mesh removal

    Thank you Jnomesh, and I wish you the same. It still shocks me to realize how insulated the medical community is, in general, from the true welfare of their patients. They perform “procedures” based on instructions generated to facilitate smooth processing of the patient, including payment for service rendered, pay by the code, but have little idea what the results of their work really are, beyond a few weeks after the procedure. Get ’em in, get ’em out, somebody else’s problem. There must be some significant psychological denial involved, and some confusion about how the work they do is not the work that they had thought it would be. By sharing our true stories, hopefully a few surgeons can become more aware, and generate the energy to change, and become more true to their oath.

    Good luck.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    July 6, 2019 at 12:53 am in reply to: How many of you have two IHs?
    quote Hiway40blues:

    Hi-my first post here. I had an IH open-with-mesh repair last Fall (October) on my right abdomen. I decided on ‘open’ for various reasons, including a strong fear of general anesthesia. Anyway it went well, still have occasional tenderness, etc.,

    Mesh causes tissue shrinkage and also makes the area around the mesh less flexible. This causes distortion and pulling on the other side. I think that it’s reasonable to assume that mesh repair on one side actually increases the risk of getting a hernia on the other side.

    If a study was done comparing 2nd hernias after repair, mesh repairs would probably show a higher rate. Another irony of mesh repair.

Page 80 of 116