Forum Replies Created

Page 6 of 114
  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 6, 2023 at 12:25 pm in reply to: Mesh removal surgeons

    Here is his list of surgeons that do mesh removal and also no mesh hernia repair. I see some new names.

    https://www.noinsurancesurgery.com/list%20of%20surgeons.html

  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 11, 2023 at 6:22 pm in reply to: Tips and tricks to avoid pain before or after hernia surgery

    Another thought, that I will be trying soon. Suspenders.

    I am still “stretching the envelope” physically after the mesh removal. The site of the original hernia still gets sore after vigorous physical activity. Ideally, I think, if I can avoid all irritation of the area it will heal fully. Or, I’ll just have a set of tools to use in certain situations. Like wearing gloves when doing hard manual work.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 10, 2023 at 12:45 pm in reply to: Surgeons collective to improve outcomes for hernia patients

    That’s good to know Dr. Towfigh, thank you. I have saved the link to the ACHQC page so that I can keep track of when this information becomes available to the public. I’m surprised though, that no surgeon, doctor, or educator has parsed through the data available to them as professionals and reported on the worst products. So that surgeons and patients can avoid them. Since nobody is removing the bad products, and surgeons keep using them. See the Aaron Stinson plug lawsuit. He had a plug implanted in 2015.

    If the knowledge of the problems with plugs had been collected and reported maybe his surgeon would not have used it. Your advice has been to “trust your surgeon”. Harry Stinson did. Now he’s been harmed and his surgeon’s name is out there as the one who harmed him, along with Bard. It’s just how things look from outside.

    The ACHQC work can fill in the gap that the device makers have left. Failure to warn. An open database, constantly tabulating results could have enormous impact. The device makers won’t be happy though. I will be surprised if the actual brand names of the products are actually shown to the public. Who knows though, I wish everybody involved the effort good luck.

    https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/personal-injury/man-awarded-500000-over-hernia-mesh-injuries/

  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 10, 2023 at 12:33 pm in reply to: Scathing (imo) report on pelvic mesh bmj

    It’s an example of the drift toward selling products, rather than improving patient care. Something to be wary of. The technology companies that will be supporting things like Shark Tank don’t really care about patient welfare. It’s why so many bad mesh products have made it to market and are still there. A focus on money over patients. The patients are the revenue sources.

    I’m just giving an objective view from the outside world.

    <header>https://www.sages.org/sages-update-from-president-horacio-asbun-2/
    </header><header>
    </header><header>”Finally, the NBT is being incorporated into the SAGES meeting for 2021 and into the future. The Emerging Technology Session will be re-branded as the NBT Session, retaining the same focus of the prior Emerging Tech Session. In 2021, a major and impactful change to the Shark Tank is being considered. Shark Tank will include a significant monetary award for the most promising innovation. Stay tuned for more details.”</header><header>
    </header><header>”We hope you will continue to keep SAGES and our mission, vision and core values in mind throughout the Fall and winter.</header>

    Mission: To innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care

    Vision: Re-imagining surgical care for a healthier world

    Values: Inclusivity, innovation, service, excellence, global community (and an unofficial value of FUN)”


  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 7, 2023 at 3:41 pm in reply to: Tips and tricks to avoid pain before or after hernia surgery

    Here is another that I just remembered. Many of us have probably worn our pants and belts the exact same way for years and have tried to go back the old ways after surgery. But even successful surgery is directly under the typical pants waistline or belt placement. I experimented with the placement of my belt buckle and end up sliding it over one loop. I also got one of those flat cam lock military type belt buckles that is infinitely adjustable. Unlike the typical belt with holes in it. The buckle is on the side, and I can adjust it on the fly in public without looking like I’m about to drop my pants.

    It’s kind of goofy to think about doing these things to try to be comfortable but it has been worth it for me.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 7, 2023 at 3:34 pm in reply to: Mesh removal surgeons

    Sensei305 said that he was prepared to do a pure tissue repair on him after his mesh removal. But he ended up going to somebody in Florida.

    Pretty sure that he would tell you over the phone. Good luck.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 5, 2023 at 12:28 pm in reply to: The value of litigation

    The latest from the Miller& Zois page, linked above.

    December 5, 2023: Georgia Settlement

    Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary Ethicon have reached a settlement in a Georgia multidistrict litigation that involves 224 cases. This settlement was confirmed through a joint motion to dismiss the claims, which was agreed upon by both parties and approved by U.S. District Judge Richard W. Story. In response to the settlement, Ethicon Inc. underscored that it accepts no real responsibility, claiming that the decision was taken to prevent a drawn-out legal process. Of course, we are long past preventing a drawn-out process in any of these hernia mesh lawsuits.

    This recent agreement comes on the heels of a similar settlement about six months earlier, in which the companies resolved claims with 161 plaintiffs in MDL-2782.

    December 4, 2023: New Bard Lawsuit

    Bard lawsuits keep coming. On Friday, the wife of a now-deceased Oklahoma man who had the Ventralight ST filed a lawsuit directly in MDL-2846. The lawsuit – which is not a wrongful death claim – makes the usual assertions of defective design, manufacturing defect and, most importantly, failure to warn.

    This case was one of two Bard hernia mesh lawsuits filed Friday.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 5, 2023 at 12:23 pm in reply to: Non-mesh repair, Dr. Reinhorn, evolution since 2015?

    Well, this is really a shame. Old threads that actually had good information, including replies from well-respected surgeons, are now being deleted.

    The infamous Chuck started a thread about Dr. Reinhorn and Dr. Reinhorn responded. I linked to it above, the “Why is Dr. Reinhorn never mentioned…”. But the link now leads to a 404 page, and searching the key words using Google also gives a 404. Dr. Reinhorn’s professional response on what seemed to be a professional discussion forum has been thrown in the garbage.

    It really does look like Dr. Towfigh has decided to let the HerniaTalk forum die a slow death. It makes one wonder. Twitter is dead, HerniaTalk.com is dying. What will happen to the YouTube channel?

    I really hope this is temporary but dev’s early responses and the recent ghosting by everybody involved in managing the web site are not good signs.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 4, 2023 at 9:24 am in reply to: Forum software problems

    @drtowfigh @dev @Carmen_Calvo

    Could one of you comment on what the future plans are for the HerniaTalk forum? At this point it is impossible to look back at any specific member’s posts because the Timeline function brings up random posts of other members instead. Any reply to a Discussion gets placed randomly in the middle of the thread, garbling the flow of the Discussion. Nobody can see Updates or Discussions unless they sign in. The site has very little value to anyone who does not create an account and sign in on a regular basis.

    I understand that getting these types of web sites working correctly is difficult and it can take time and effort. My question is – will more time and effort be spent to get the forum working correctly? Or is it considered to be “done” now?

    If a decision has been made to just “cancel” the forum that would be understandable, but this seems like an odd way to do it. Although it has great value to patients looking for information about hernias and repair methods, it’s definitely not good for the business of hernia repair. I have to imagine that Dr. Towfigh gets constant push-back from industry representatives and fellow surgeons to just let the forum die. Go back to the darkness, stop letting people shine light on the problems, despite the supposed push for “informed consent”.

    I hope that this chaos on the forum is just temporary and that there really is a plan for a properly functioning and informative discussion forum. At this point there is still a lot of work ahead. Thanks for the years of good informed discussion so far, since the forum’s inception, whatever your future plans are. Many people have been helped by information from the old forum.

  • Good intentions

    Member
    December 2, 2023 at 12:11 pm in reply to: Surgeons collective to improve outcomes for hernia patients

    My posts are out of order again so they make little sense if you just read down the page. So I’ll reply directly to the last one so it will stay in order.

    Here is a page on the ACHQC web site that seems to describe what we, the patients, need. Unfortunately, everyone involved in the hernia repair business has a vested interest in not changing. The surgeons have many patients behind them that have the mesh that they chose and if they change to a new mesh or new method the patients can reasonably ask “what was wrong with the one you used on me?”

    The device makers have millions of dollars in marketing promotions and also potential liability from lawsuits if they change. The patient can reasonably ask “if you knew that the product had problems why didn’t you tell me before my surgeon used it on me?”

    All that’s left is to make the information freely (free is the key) available to patients who are trying to be informed about the dangerous surgery that they need.

    The ACHQC implies that this collected information will soon be available. I have to imagine though that the sponsors, the device makers supplying the funding, will be nervous about what is shown. I wouldn’t be surprised if the specificity is dumbed down to all mesh products lumped together in to broad categories like “light weight” and “standard” mesh. What the patient needs is the brand names: 3D Max, Progrip, Ovitex, etc. So they can see the actual results and make a choice, just like buying a set of tires or a microwave.

    It will be interesting to see how things develop. So far, the ACHQC is just a group of surgeons under the purview of the device makers, saying “we’re trying to make things better”. Without specific numbers though, the effort is of little use. I think also, that the whole thing could just be another research tool, plus promotion of mesh devices. It could just be a facade.</font>

    Public Reporting Public Reporting of ACHQC Data

    COMING SOON

    123,398 Enrolled Patients

    462 Participating Surgeons”

    https://achqc.org/data/public-reporting

Page 6 of 114